Registered Professional Forester jobs in British Columbia | thebluetones.info
Jobs 1 - 20 of 44 forest technologist jobs in Canada. Sort by. Relevance. Date. Posted with the Association of BC Forest Professionals as a Forest Technologist with the Association of British Columbia Forest Professionals (ABCFP) as a. Sep 14, The Association of BC Forest Professionals and Engineers and BC will be responding to the FPB by the requested date of March 31, Jobs 1 - 10 of 68 LSO FORS 2 - Stewardship Revenue Forester ***Closing Date as a Registered Professional Forester with the Association of BC Forest.
CCOHS: OSH Links: British Columbia
The Harvesting Superintendent is responsible for delivery of volumes to meet manufacturing facility needs and Company commitments. This is a full time position and the successful candidate will be a member of the Vanderhoof Woodlands team.
Ensure activities are conducted in compliance with all applicable Occupational Health and Safety requirements, forestry legislation, Canfor's Environmental Policy, Forestry Principles, and Forestry Management System.
Implement and sustain identified efficiencies and cost savings initiatives through performance management. Participate in the development of annual budgets and rolling monthly outlook projections to achieve cost targets. Providing and supporting a positive atmosphere for personal, professional and team development. University Degree or Technical Diploma with a minimum of 10 years forestry experience, experience in a mill setting is an asset. We offer a number of training programs and development opportunities to support each of our employees in their pursuit of career advancement and growth.
Whether you want to develop upon your skills or advance your career with Canfor, we offer a promote-from-within culture that will give you these opportunities. Canfor Values At Canfor, our values are at the core of everything we do.
Safety comes first, and we are proud of our unwavering commitment to excellence, and customer satisfaction, which allows us to safely and efficiently deliver quality products to our customers around the globe. We succeed when our customers succeed. We are resilient and resourceful. We always find a way forward. We are a good neighbour in our communities and a responsible steward of the environment.
Conservation strategies provide potential mitigation benefits because natural forests typically store more carbon than managed forests because of their longer disturbance cycles and greater proportion of older stands [ 2223 ]. In contrast, strategies focused on timber harvesting and more intensive forest management offer mitigation potential associated with increased forest carbon uptake rates e. The frequency of occurrence of natural disturbances represents an important factor to consider when defining such forest management strategies [ 23 ].
Third, strategies that focus on the use of wood products can also be effective at increasing carbon removals and reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. In particular, the time over which carbon is stored in wood products depends greatly on their life duration. Some wood products have very short useful half lives, such as paper 2. Wood products can also be used as substitute for other products, so as to offset emissions from more energy-intensive products such as concrete and steel i.
The next section provides the theoretical basis and motivations for our survey design. In particular, we present a brief synthesis of key insights from relevant literatures to justify the set of variables that were selected for this study. However, forests are increasingly being managed based on multiple public values [ 3132 ]. Because of the important influence of values on preferences for environmental and risk management scenarios, numerous scales have been created and used for the purpose of evaluating public environmental values [ 34 ], including the New Environmental Paradigm [ 3536 ] and the cultural theory scale [ 37 ].
They are often situated somewhere on a continuum ranging from anthropocentric to biocentric, as observed in the Forest Value Scale first developed by Steel et al. An anthropocentric value-orientation is associated with the perception that nature and forests represent a resource to be utilized by humans for their well-being; it mainly focuses on humans and their needs [ 39 ].
Common menu bar links
As Aubin et al. While still recognizing the importance of humans, biocentrists locate them within the greater natural context and perceive nature as holding intrinsic value on its own. As such, humans have the responsibility to protect nature: In the context of forest management and climate change, a biocentric orientation would normally encourage practices that limit human impact on nature, whereas anthropocentric individuals would not hesitate to draw on technological solutions and the large-scale implementation or intensification of forest management strategies if it had the potential to lead to significant mitigation potential.
However, the emerging discussions about climate and atmospheric changes and their increasingly important impacts on ecosystems somewhat complicates the anthropocentric versus biocentric views. In fact, climate change mitigation is about limiting the human impact on climate and hence on ecosystems in the long run. Biocentric individuals may thus justify active intervention in forests, for instance when inaction may have more damaging impacts on ecosystems than active forest management.
Research in this domain has shown that the public generally perceives the threats posed by climate change as less important than the scientists do, especially in developed countries [ 475051 ]. This observation is linked to the vague and seemingly distant features of climate change, both spatially and temporally. Consequently, studies increasingly highlight the importance of personal experience in both shaping risk perception and willingness to act in mitigating climate change [ 52 — 54 ].
SFM in British Columbia
In effect, the likelihood that climate change is perceived to pose a serious risk generally increases when someone has recently experienced an event that they directly associate with climate change [ 47 ]. However, while some studies do not find significant relationships between knowledge and risk perception [ 56 ], others even contradict this assumption by showing that higher knowledge can actually reduce risk perception of climate change [ 5758 ] or of forest pest outbreaks [ 59 ].
Nevertheless, divergent trends have been observed. On the one hand, perceived risk might increase if members of the public realize that experts are worrying about the negative impacts of climate change [ 65 ].
On the other hand, Kellstedt et al. In Canada, a high confidence in forest agencies, experts and industry has been positively associated with acceptance of forest management policies and their implied risks [ 5566 ]. Olsen and Shindler [ 67 ] explain, using the case study of forest fire management, that trust in forest agencies and land managers is particularly important when the public lacks familiarity with, but values the outcomes of management practices.