Wikipedia | Shroud of Turin Blog
Case File: The Shroud of Turin Location: Turin, Italy Date: Description: Dr. Paul Damon, at the University of Arizona, headed the carbon dating team in. The bones were dated by radiocarbon dating and confirmed that the date of death of the skeleton was Wikipedia. thebluetones.info Shroud_of_Turin. In Dr John Jackson of the Turin Shroud Center of the carbon content of the cloth, rendering carbon-dating.
Fringe theories about the Shroud of Turin - Wikipedia
Is the Shroud of Turin older than we think? It exhibited two miraculous properties: There are many articles  online that say two scientists, Giulio Fanti, and Saverio Gaeta, have reexamined the shroud, and found it to be from around the time Jesus existed.
There are three problems with this pronouncement. First, just because the shroud is from that time does not mean it was necessarily the shroud of Jesus. Yes, the shroud looks like the man was crucified, but it is widely accepted that crucifixion was the most common way to execute people during the First Century CE.
Also the 14C-based date of the material doesn't mean the object was manufactured at that time, it is the date when the plants used to weave the cloth were alive.
These usually correspond to the same approximate date within the error range of 14C dating unless the weaver is using unusually old plant material or the cloth being used was already old when it was used. Second, both scientists are Catholics.
I think we all know the track record of claims by Christians in matters of the faith. Also, there might be some motivation for Catholics to want to prove the shroud is real in that Pope Benedict XVI declared it the "official burial shroud of Jesus". Third, the methods used. Infrared rays are able to determine the age of something very recent, and not the ancient past.
The other method was spectroscopy, which has absolutely nothing to do with the age of the object. Hypocrisy[ edit ] Of course some "Shroudies" will claim the skeptics and critics are in denial. However, they seem to have forgotten all the times they've been questioning the Shroud just because of the "right date".
The reasons the carbon dating didn't work was for the nitpickiest of reasons. So it's tested again on the "right date", and we find something wrong with that test. Suddenly it's the skeptics and critics who are being nitpicky! It's not uncommon for Christian fundies to do this, rather it's a pretty standard M. However, in his description, St. John still speaks of the image of Jesus' face when he was alive.
In several articles, Daniel Scavoneprofessor Emeritus of history at the University of southern Indiana, puts forward a hypothesis which identifies the Shroud of Turin as the real object that inspires the romances of the Holy Grail.
The Shroud Of Turin
Among the reasons are too big differences in the historical descriptions of the Image of Edessa compared to the shroud. On the occasion of the transfer of the cloth to Constantinople inGregory Referendarius, archdeacon of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, preached a sermon about the artifact. This sermon had been lost but was rediscovered in the Vatican Archives and translated by Mark Guscin  in This sermon says that this Edessa cloth contained not only the face, but a full-length image, which was believed to be of Jesus.
The sermon also mentions bloodstains from a wound in the side. Other documents have since been found in the Vatican library and the University of LeidenNetherlands, confirming this impression. Shroud proponents cite it as evidence for the shroud's existence before the fourteenth century, citing an L-shaped patch near the hands, which would correspond to four burn holes in the relic.
Also, the weave of the cloth in the lower panel suggests to them the unusual weave of the shroud. Critics point out that there is no evidence that the rectangle is a shroud rather than a tombstone, that the holes are not just decorative elements, and that there is no image on the alleged shroud.
- The Hacking of the Carbon Dating, Wikipedia and the Media
- Navigation menu
An illustration of what appears to some to be the Shroud of Turin complete with the distinctive "L-shaped" burn marks and what is interpreted by some to be fishbone weave is depicted in Codex Prayan Illuminated manuscript written in Budapest, Hungary between and It was written between and 65 years before the earliest carbon date in the tests. One of its illustrations shows preparations for the burial of Christ. The picture supposedly includes a burial cloth in the post-resurrection scene.
History of the Shroud of Turin - Wikipedia
According to proponents, it has the same herringbone weave as the Shroud, plus four holes near one of the edges. The holes form an "L" shape.
Proponents claim this odd pattern of holes is the same as the ones found on the Shroud of Turin. They are burn holes, perhaps from a hot poker or incense embers.
Rinaldi also points out that the alleged shroud in the Pray codex does not contain any image. Ina knight named Robert de Clari who participated in the Fourth Crusade that captured Constantinople, claims the cloth was among the countless relics in the city: And none knows - neither Greek nor Frank - what became of that shroud when the city was taken. Thus the original French could equally well be translated as the cloth was raised upright.
De Clari's matter of fact delivery does not suggest that he witnessed anything out of the ordinary.
However, the historians Madden and Queller describe this part of Robert's account as a mistake: Robert had actually seen or heard of the sudarium, the handkerchief of Saint Veronica which also purportedly contained the image of Jesusand confused it with the grave cloth sindon.
From the document, dated 1 August in Rome: We know that the sacred objects are preserved by their predators in Venice, in France, and in other places, the sacred linen in Athens. Some authors suggest that the shroud was captured by the knight Otto de la Roche who became Duke of Athenssometimes adding that he soon relinquished it to the Knights Templar.
Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin
It was subsequently taken to France, where the first known keeper of the Turin Shroud had links both to the Templars as well the descendants of Otto. Some speculate that the shroud could have been a major part of the famed "Templar treasure" that treasure hunters still seek today.
The association with the Templars seems to be based on a coincidence of family names; the Templars were a celibate order and so unlikely to have children after entering the Order.
The complete history of the Shroud of Turin is a bit convoluted, but it is believed to have reached France from Constantinople, where it was known as the Edessa Cloth, and spirited to Europe during the Crusades.
This case originally ran on the October 2, episode. An update to this story aired on September 7, Reverend Albert Dreisbach passed away in aged Forensic illustrator and anthropologist Dr. Emily Craig believed that she found a way to re-create the Shroud's distinct qualities. She used "dust drawing" and naturally-occurring pigments. The higher areas, such as the nose, forehead, and cheek, had more pigment than other parts of the face. This prevented any brush strokes from being shown.
A textile scientist used computer analysis on Dr.