1st 2nd base in dating | FPSS Foster Parent Support Services Society
By the third 'date' we were having a hot a steamy make-out session that lasted the better Is it bad form to skip third base and go all the way?. Gallery from 1st floor windows., or second base dating; sex; sex; 8 more question . C. C. It goes like in dating relationships. Then after the. It goes like this: First base is a hot and heavy makeout session. Second base is all hands with the guy making his way up the girl's shirt. activities as baseball, a concept apparently dating as far back as the s, is inherently goal-oriented.
Setting intercourse as the goal inherently means ranking other sexual acts as less intimate, which ignores the complexities of our desires and comfort zones. In a rush to pass the specifically spelled-out bases, foreplay isn't even a priority — first base isn't something to brag about to your "bros. This is especially key for women, who are more likely to orgasm when oral sex is involved. Many have said that letting a man go down on her feels "intimate and emotional and thus more desirable in a relationship," not something to be shared with just a fling.
Ultimately, the ranking ends up disregarding the ways women experience sex and orgasm, focusing the system inherently on male pleasure. Within this "base system," sex is only sex when it is P-in-V — you're just building up until you score a penetrative home run.
But sex is more than that. Movie nights are for real friends, not hey-let-me-get-you-alone-in-the-dark "friends". Hell, I stopped going on coffee dates with people I'm not interested in when it's clear they're only asking because they want more later. The sooner you're upfront about your intentions, the better off everyone will be. If you don't want to go "all the way" ugheither make that clear with your actions -- keep all your clothes on -- or your words: Depends what's already been done in the course of dating.
I think that early in dating, I would interpret a request for "a quiet night in" like this as a desire for a step up in intimacy- from square one to kissing, from kissing to full-on feely-up makeouts, or from full-on makeouts to intercourse. So if you invite someone in after a date or over for a movie date, but then turn around and say in a vampy-finger pointed way "But don't get the wrong idea! If not, it will just come off as strange.
I've had someone say back "don't think you are" and then I immediately wanted them more. If you want to enjoy some clothes off time without "sex" you can also say after some making out something like ok this is awkward"I'm not interested in taking it too far tonight. Can you handle it? I'm usually way more saucier but you get the idea.
Sometimes it can just be as simple as "I like you but there isn't going to be sex for awhile until I get to know you better. And if he isn't he'll disappear and he isn't the right guy for you. If the person physically moves it forward, you decline, and he tries again, then immediately end the night. I've been on first dates that ended up in the bedroom, and I've dated guys for months without more than a few goodnight kisses. Things happened once I felt comfortable enough to want them to happen.
Of course, for me, a lot depends on how well I know a person. Sleeping together after the first date isn't going to happen with some guy who I met online, but is likely to happen with someone I've been friendly acquaintances with for a few months.
So I don't really have a timeline, it mostly depends on when I feel I can trust them, and when I feel comfortable taking things into the realm of physical. In your case, I would be straightforward about being new to the dating scene. If you want to "take it slow" let them know what that means to you needing time to get comfortable, a certain number of dates before you think you're ready, or "I'll tell you when I'm ready to move forward" Keep in mind, this makes you responsible for making the first move when you're sure its what you want to do.
I come from a sex-positive background with a ton of sexual assault support workers and sex educators as friends, so I am particularly sensitive to signs of disinterest and boundaries being reached. I am completely ok with "no" meaning stop right now.
I don't think this is the norm for straight men. As far as bases go: I don't even know what those are. I tend to find myself in situations where we have some kind of sexual activity manual, oral, penetration; any of these counts or none at all well kissing yes but that's less sexualthere's no halfway point.
There's no "ok let's just take our tops off and nothing else", if that's what you were asking. Expect is the wrong word Makeout time, assuming signals about this were given prior. Anything more than that is a bonus.
This discussion should happen before any clothes are removed. I don't think this through that much.
4 Relationship Bases When You Get Intimate With Someone
There's nonverbal body language like the way her head tilts when our faces are close to each other, how her breathing changes, etc. Anything more than kissing usually gets a "is this ok? Generally if the clothes come off, that's a signal to touch what has been shown. If she pushes my hands away, I check her expression and try to figure out if she's fighting for fun this usually means she's smirking or if she's upset.
If the expression is hard to read, I ask. If you don't want to use those parts sexually, either discuss it or leave those clothes on. Again, I am incredibly atypical compared to the usual straight man.
The "Four Bases" System Is Everything Wrong With How We Talk About Sex
It's ok if these boundaries then change but at least give your partner a starting point. Be honest and straightforward. Its amazing the species reproduces. My advice is be aware--everyone and every pairing is different. A mindful approach, focusing on the situation, rather than a checklist is great.
Answering for myself, definitely not. Consent and trust are sexy to play around with, but not on the first date. But from talking with friends of both genders, I think it is pretty clear that a lot of people don't see it that way at all. People sometimes put up fake resistance expecting it to be violated, and people someones expect that resistance is fake and can be ignored.
Personally I think that is a crappy way to interact and a recipe for disaster, but the reality is that you can't take it as a given that the guy you are making out with will react the way you expect or hope if you want to put the brakes on suddenly.
If a girl invites me up, I'd hope that we were going to have sex, and would think of it as a reasonable possibility, but if it was just drinks and a bit of making out I certainly wouldn't complain. I don't think there's anything wrong with being clear about your intentions. I've had girls say anything from the fact that they like taking things slow to just outright saying that they're not going to sleep with me that night, and in none of those situations did I ever consider it a negative thing.
Putting them on the same page as you in as clear a way as possible is a good thing. I tend to wait for the signs either to be incredibly clear and obvious, however if I ever feel a slight bit of resistance when taking it to another level i. As previously stated, if she's indicated that, I know where the line is and I don't cross it. I've had a girl stop me at one point, but then guide my hand to do the same thing later on that same night when things have progressed further.
It varies, depending on you, the other person, the moment, the mood and many other unforeseeable and often barely-tangible factors. The bottom line is relax and go with the flow. If you feel hesitant and in need of boundaries or more time, behave accordingly. If you feel mad for it and it's reciprocated, dive in. I mean, why not? Now, that said, boundaries on both sides have to be respected, without exception. An expression of reluctance or resistance should always be taken at face value.
Besides, do you really want to push sex on someone who may not be sufficiently into it, or you? I would hope not. If you respect all wishes, whether sincere or not, your partner will know exactly where they stand with you. This would never be acceptable. This would be assault. If she pushed me away, I would treat that in the most direct, face-value way and back off, probably with an apology. She's saying no, she doesn't want that.
This sort of thing shouldn't even be a source of doubt. And no, that absolutely does not entitle me to try and refuse your resistance -- It does make me pretty inclined to ignore your phone call the next day because I don't want to be dating someone with the sexual maturity of a year-old.
I am a year-old man, I do not want to do the same things I did in high school. I am not really that excited about touching your boobs as an end in itself. Actually, I'm married, so it's fairly moot for me, but if I wasn't, I'd want to date someone that treats sex in a bit more adult manner. My wife and I did not have sex on the first date, but we did have sex the first time we started undressing around each other.
For the record, in terms of my question 4, I've experienced several variations. One was with a guy who seemed to very clearly respect that I didn't want to go too far. He constantly checked in and I found that comforting. I find those least honest with themselves have the most difficulty being straight forward with others, though that may be stating the obvious. If anything, I've been "successful" in my dating life by wearing my heart on my sleeve. When asked what I think the best qualities a mate can have, I answer: If you can hit home runs emotionally, you'll more often do so physically.
You'll also be stronger each time at bat. I don't "agree" with griffX.
- Navigation menu
- Recommended video
One word that seems to be completely gone from dating vocabulary and which you would have heard in many American films and TV shows is the word "steady" we're going steady; he's my steady, etc. I think that's unfortunate.
What to do right after 2nd base!?
I like the word and it is considerably more applicable to today's dating environment than to the one that hatched it. Today, many people date many people at the same time. They could refer to their "regular" as their "steady", but they don't. Sorry to babble, it's a topic dear to my heart. Like many non-Americans, I've always been highly confused about the semantics and the system of dating It's interesting the system of dating is mysterious to others.
What is the process of courtship outside of the US? I mean, most everyone has progressed from clubbing the female over the head and dragging her back to the cave, I assume? I can't picture you bartering cows for wives, either, Miguel. I didn't like online dating very much because you can spend a lot of time and energy trying to get to know someone via email or on the phone, and it doesn't really matter if you don't have chemistry in person.
Until you get the two people in the same room, you can never tell. No, I genuinely don't know. I've never had an American girlfriend, though I've often dreamt of one. Till the age of 12 - when I was moved from the Anglo-American side to the Portuguese side of the English school I went to - almost all my girlfriends were Americans. But that was as a child - nor really the same.
To tell the truth, I really haven't met any American women when I wasn't with someone else I was serious with at the time, so the opportunity never arose, unfortunately. There is no such thing as "dating" and "dates" in Europe, including the UK. It varies wildly even in small sections of states, never mind the whole US of A.
And the bases always seemed to get redefined every two years or so from ages If real baseball were played the same way older children explained sex to us, veteran baseball players would be faced with a field where first base was a mile away and then the other three bases were within 3 feet of that.
I've never been able to explain it adequately to a European. On the other hand, I arrived in Europe with the American idea that you have to go through an entire negotiation process when you start sleeping with someone, and it took me a long time to get used to a more spontaneous way of doing things. French doesn't even have a word for "dating", and the whole concepts of "commitment" and "relationship" don't translate very well, either.
In France and Spain, the philosophy is that you sleep with someone first, and then you figure out if you want to be with them -- the direct opposite of what seems to happen in America.
There's a lot less pressure to define what an affair means, and people seem to fall in and out of love more completely and quickly than in the US. The whole "bases" thing is really part of early adolescence, a way for boys to brag about their first fumbling sexual experiences when they're still virgins. I don't know about today, but when I was a kid there was still a lot of stigma attached to girls who "went all the way", and so boys often had to settle for what they could get.
This is helpful in distinguishing the relationship from "going out," which more or less implies monogamy, although you can increase the ambiguity by saying "I've been going out with so-and-so. While she was away, I went to a party held by some of her friends, and when I met her friends who didn't yet know me, I explained my connection was that I was dating so-and-so.
There had definitely already been plenty of intimacy. But she was not my girlfriend yet. I'm American, and most of my adult relationships have started that way. And I don't think it's that uncommon, really. If you start sleeping together right away, then the point of the "dating" could no longer possibly be to lead up to the sex Funniest thing I expect I'll read today. To me, a date is like an appointment to hang out with someone you don't know well, to see if you have any chemistry and then to see if you'd like to continue to see each other.
So, if you were hanging out with a guy, it was a date. If you hung out with girls, not-a-date. Hence the weird terms like "double dating" which was a "safe" way to date, I guess. I usually go out with people that I already know I like through some other context [we're friends from work, we knew each other online, we're friends of friends, they used to date a friend of mine in high school] when it's clear that there's chemistry and we just want to spend some time together.
I also have a lot of guy friends, so there has occasionally been some confusion about what "Do you want to go to the movies with me? Other things I think about dating: This is not quite as clear cut when you say "go out with". No, but you shouldn't be surprised if that's what they're thinking. As a woman, I try pretty hard to make it clear to people who ask me to do something if it's a "let's see what happens" affair, or an "I like you only in a friendly way" event.
Similarly, nowadays, when I invite guys to do things, I make sure they know I have a boyfriend and am not looking for any other romantic interests, so they know what they are getting into up front. Seems like common courtesy, but a lot of people I know don't do this.
A rain check to me means "try again later" I think it's easy to clear this stuff up at the time and see if there's another possibility. So if you say "how about next week? As a result, I advise my guy friends to make it pretty clear how they feel and be on the lookout for "I like you as a friend" indicators [like bringing friends on dates, not dating in the evenings, not returning calls, making excuses that wouldn't stop someone who was really interested in your, etc].
I also know a lot of guys who seems to have long-term commitments to people they don't seem to really like very much. They are clearly getting something out of the relationship [sex?
I don't get that. When I was in hogh school and a bit into college [late 80's] you had to pretend that you weren't sleeping with people you were dating, only maybe people you were "going out with" which was like being engaged to being engaged in the Catholic enclave that I grew up in. I think Americans can have a hard time admitting that they're looking for sex and some companionship as opposed to a lifelong committment, or the potential thereof.
As a result, you meet men who keep you at arms length because they think you want to breed with them, and you have women who are either wanting to breed [at my age] and being really weird about how they meet and go out with men, or who become strange wallflowers who play a lot of the games Dobbs describes. Intimacy freaks a lot of people out and the weird ritual dance that is dating only makes it even weirder. For historical background, Dating Do's and Don'ts posted by stupidsexyFlanders at 8: I am now 45 years of age and living in Atlanta, so others' milage may vary.
Until about 10 years ago, asking for and accepting a first date was fairly much non-committal except that it had to be a full-blown date of dinner and entertainment. The second date meant "I'm interested but I want to get to know you better, " and the third meant, "We're having sex tonight but dinner had better be good. Among the younger set, 35 and below, the pace is much faster. Again, the first date is often a casual meet-up that ends by going to the male's home to 'check out your lifestyle'.
The second meet-up within a day or two occurs at the female's home with sex that evening. Sprinkle all of the above with generous amounts of phone time. This is important, time spent talking on the phone has pretty much replaced the time spent in preliminary dating. Again, the above is highly generalized, and I have synthesized both my experience and what my friends have told me about their experiences.
To put it simply, nowadays asking for and accepting a first date is an unspoken admission of "Yeah, I'd do you. Just don't bore me. Minor point, Miguel, but the postponer actually offers the rain check, which was originally "a ticket stub entitling the holder to admission to a future event if the scheduled event was cancelled due to rain.
I would say a date implies that no one else is invited. I've been with my boy for years, and when we plan "dates," we mean we're gonna just hang out together. Of course, this could just be because we have many of the same friends, so inviting someone else along isn't unusual. As for dating, which is to say, going on formalized adventures usually featuring food and a movie or a party, I would say it is on the decline.
Most people I know meet people through others or, when they meet someone, invite that person to group stuff first. I can't think of the last time I or anyone I share details with stopped at oral sex willingly stupid too-drunk boys.
I've gotta disagree with Mischief.